Dear Professional Colleague,
We are sharing with you an important judgment of Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai, in the case of Supreme Inds. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik [(2015) 1 TMI 122 – CESTAT Mumbai] on following issue:
Whether in case of remand matter, the Department is entitled to hold the amount deposited as ‘pre-deposit’ by the Assessee during the course of investigation?
Facts & background:
In the instant case, investigation was conducted in the factory of Supreme Inds Ltd. (“the Appellant”) and some discrepancies were found with the physical stock and stock shown in Form 3CD declared under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellant made a deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs during the course of investigation. Thereafter, Show Cause Notice was issued to the Appellant for demanding duty on the basis of investigation made. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 10,47,000/- and also imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,91,000/-.
On appeal being filed before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai, the Hon’ble Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication. Thereafter, the Appellant filed a refund claim on September 22, 2005 for the amount deposited by them during the course of investigation.
Both the Lower Authorities rejected the refund claim on the ground that since the adjudication is yet to take place, the amount deposited by the Appellant is not required to be refunded. Hence, the refund claim filed by the Appellant is premature. Being aggrieved the Appellant preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai.
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court in the case of Nelco Ltd. [(2002) 144 E.L.T. 56 (Bom.)] which was further affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in [(2002) 144 E.L.T. A104 (S.C.)], holding that in case of remand matter, the Department was not entitled to hold on to the amount deposited by the Assessee during the course of investigation as pre-deposit.
Accordingly the Hon’ble CESTAT held that the refund claim filed by the Appellant is not premature and the Department is required to refund the amount deposited by the Appellant during the course of investigation.
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.
Thanks & Best Regards,Bimal Jain FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons) Delhi: Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor, Pocket – 1, Mayur Vihar, Phase – I, Delhi – 110091, India Desktel: +91-11-22757595/ 42427056 Mobile: +91 9810604563 Chandigarh: H. No. 908, Sector 12-A, Panchkula, Haryana – 134115 Kolkata: Ist Floor, 10 R G Kar Road Shyambazar, Kolkata – 700 004 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Web: www.a2ztaxcorp.com
Disclaimer: The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the authors nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Readers are advised to consult the professional for understanding applicability of this newsletter in the respective scenarios. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without our written permission.